Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?

From: torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp, sunchengxi(at)highgo(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom?
Date: 2021-03-25 15:33:08
Message-ID: 412364455aab94cf8d352f460e4ad0aa@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-03-25 22:14, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2021/03/23 16:32, torikoshia wrote:
>> On 2021-03-05 17:47, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your comments!
>
> Thanks for updating the patch!
>
> PostgreSQL Patch Tester reported that the patched version failed to be
> compiled
> at Windows. Could you fix this issue?
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.131238
>

It seems PGDLLIMPORT was necessary..
Attached a new one.

Regards.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-add-plan-type-to-pgss.patch text/x-diff 9.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-03-25 15:50:39 Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-03-25 15:30:31 Re: [PATCH] Add extra statistics to explain for Nested Loop