Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Steve Bergman <steve(at)rueb(dot)com>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta?
Date: 2004-08-17 20:32:45
Message-ID: 41226B6D.60503@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway wrote:
> Version 2 of the source rpm is now available here:
> http://www.joeconway.com/postgresql-8.0.0beta1/SRPM/postgresql-8.0.0beta1-2PGDG.src.rpm
>
> I've also put up i386 binary rpms for fc1 and fc2, and x86_64 binary
> rpms for fc2.

Hopefully the third try is a charm ;-)

Version 3 is now available: fixes the init script. Previously
/etc/init.d/postgresql worked the first time used (i.e. would initdb and
start postgres) but not the second and subsequent times.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-08-17 21:03:10 Re: Documents storage
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-08-17 19:33:46 Re: Pseudo-Off-topic-survey: Opinions about future of

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Matthews 2004-08-17 20:36:57 need help
Previous Message Frank van Vugt 2004-08-17 19:42:16 Re: Does a 'stable' deferred trigger execution order exist? -> answer: yes

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-08-17 20:42:28 What else is needed for PITR?
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-08-17 20:12:47 Re: initdb failure on win32