| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>, Michael Bondarenko <work(dot)michael(dot)2956(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #18348: Inconsistency with EXTRACT([field] from INTERVAL); |
| Date: | 2024-02-19 17:22:33 |
| Message-ID: | 4116086.1708363353@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 9.9.1. EXTRACT, date_part
> hour field description as
> `
> The hour field (0–23)
> `
> Do we need to update for the EXTRACT(INTERVAL) case?
Yeah, probably. I did a bit more wordsmithing too.
Here's a rolled-up patch.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-interval-extract-docs-fixes.patch | text/x-diff | 15.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-02-20 03:00:00 | Re: BUG #18344: Pruning tables partitioned by bool range fails with invalid strategy |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2024-02-19 09:45:21 | Re: BUG #18344: Pruning tables partitioned by bool range fails with invalid strategy |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-02-19 17:37:49 | Re: Optimize planner memory consumption for huge arrays |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-02-19 17:00:11 | Re: Avoid switching between system-user and system-username in the doc |