Re: Autovacuum Integration Patch Take 5

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum Integration Patch Take 5
Date: 2004-08-06 09:30:19
Message-ID: 41134FAB.5090904@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
>
>
> You're headed in the right direction, but I'm afraid we're running out
> of time. The core committee has chewed this over and agreed that we
> can't postpone beta for the amount of time we think it will take to make
> this patch committable. So we're going to hold it over for the 8.1
> release cycle.

IMHO releasing 8.0 without autovacuum will lead to vastly increased
traffic on support lists, because many (most?) win32 users will fail to
setup a vacuum for themselves; they are much less used to have some
maintenance tasks on a server than linux users. This might become a
nightmare for the community.

I'd opt for including integrated autovacuum in Beta2, despite the
maximum violation of feature freeze/beta release policies.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-08-06 10:06:41 Re: Win32 tablespace
Previous Message Dave Page 2004-08-06 08:15:17 Re: Win32 tablespace