| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: stderr piping under win32 |
| Date: | 2004-07-30 14:37:09 |
| Message-ID: | 410A5D15.7030006@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
>
> IIRC, it is because the handles returned by the pipe call are later
> select()'d on with other sockets, which is not possible with handles
> returned by _pipe.
That's true, select() is not possible on file and pipe handles. To
achieve wait-and-timeout, WaitForSingleObject is necessary, which will
take a different handle type than _pipe delivers. Well, Tom already made
some comments on M$'s standard compliance...
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-07-30 15:30:49 | Re: [ADMIN] Secure DB Systems - How to |
| Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-07-30 11:50:37 | Re: stderr piping under win32 |