| From: | "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY |
| Date: | 2025-10-07 06:16:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4108d486-3120-4ea2-917f-42773b7da375@app.fastmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025, at 07:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> writes:
>> Trying to fix the NetBSD failure.
>> I don't understand why 001_constraint_validation, test 'list_parted2_def
>> scanned' and test 'part_5 verified by existing constraints' should be
>> affected by this patch. I guess I could have gotten something wrong with
>> the locking with dshash, that might somehow affect other tests?
>
> Our CI infrastructure is not as stable as one could wish. You
> sure this is related at all?
No, not sure at all. OK, then going forward, I guess I should ignore
errors coming from just a single farm animal if the error seems
unrelated to my patch.
/Joel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-10-07 06:39:01 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Schneider | 2025-10-07 05:59:33 | sync_standbys_defined and pg_stat_replication |