Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on
Date: 2018-04-18 16:50:48
Message-ID: 41012425-6aa0-e06c-a2f2-e5d17bb686f9@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/18/2018 12:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:

> Please change the name of the "JIT" parameter to something meaningful
> to humans before this gets too far into the wild.
>
> SSL is somewhat understandable because its not a Postgres-private term.

JIT is hardly a Postgres-private term. It's a familiar term in a
widespread community, though I might cede the point that the
community in question is more compiler wonks than DBAs.

-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2018-04-18 16:52:26 Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-18 16:36:18 Re: Deadlock in multiple CIC.