| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fixing PKs and Uniques in tablespaces |
| Date: | 2004-07-23 03:24:16 |
| Message-ID: | 410084E0.4080509@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> I never really considered oracle's implementation of tablespaces when I
>> worked on tablespaces. The database default tablespace seems similar to
>> Oracle's SYSTEM tablespace. I'm not sure if they use a global tablespace
>> like we do.
>
>
> My point was that Oracle has added a tablespace clause to the constraint
> clause, so we can too!
>
> Also, since I checked and it seems that our syntax for putting tables an
> d indexes in tablespaces at creation time is identical to oracle's,
> perhaps we should copy them on constraints as well.
Since we're getting close to beta, can we have consensus on what I'm to
do about this?
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-07-23 04:15:19 | Re: [JDBC] V3 protocol + DECLARE problems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-23 03:14:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial |