| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| Date: | 2004-07-22 23:08:09 |
| Message-ID: | 410048D9.8020707@coretech.co.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Excellent - Just updated and it is all good!
This change makes the whole "how do I do my backup" business nice and
basic - which the right way IMHO.
regards
Mark
Tom Lane wrote:
>Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
>
>
>>2) Is is possible to make the recovery kick in even though pg_control
>>says the database state is shutdown?
>>
>>
>
>Yeah, I think you are right: presence of recovery.conf should force a
>WAL scan even if pg_control claims it's shut down. Fix committed.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | bcscomputers | 2004-07-22 23:33:33 | |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-22 22:37:21 | Re: [ADMIN] how to find transaction associated with a lock |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2004-07-22 23:12:27 | Re: Tutorial |
| Previous Message | Ian Burrell | 2004-07-22 22:44:14 | ffunc called multiple for same value |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-22 23:26:53 | Re: initdb authentication |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-22 21:46:10 | Re: win32 readline |