Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "daniel(at)yesql(dot)se" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com" <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2021-02-04 18:35:28
Message-ID: 40b9dd923a3021e5f17b4444a0bb6485098986d6.camel@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 16:30 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 08:33:35PM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > Note that this changes the error message printed during the invalid-
> > root tests, because NSS is now sending the root of the chain. So the
> > server's issuer is considered untrusted rather than unrecognized.
>
> I think that it is not a good idea to attach the since-v*.diff patches
> into the threads. This causes the CF bot to fail in applying those
> patches.

Ah, sorry about that. Is there an extension I can use (or lack thereof)
that the CF bot will ignore, or does it scan the attachment contents?

--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-02-04 18:49:32 Re: Multiple full page writes in a single checkpoint?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-02-04 17:36:37 Re: Faulty HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED hintbit combination