| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de> |
| Cc: | markw(at)osdl(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| Date: | 2004-07-20 22:09:29 |
| Message-ID: | 40FD9819.50401@coretech.co.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I'd vote for it as a clarity factor too.
Klaus Naumann wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 markw(at)osdl(dot)org wrote:
>
>
>
>>FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "archive_mode"
>>
>>Have I missed something since it has been committed?
>>
>>
>
>Yes, Tom has removed this option in favorite of just setting
>archive_command to a value which then enables the PITR code also.
>
>But as I've seen this isn't discussed to the very end currently.
>
>My 2ct: I'd prefer to have archive_mode in the config as it really makes
>clear that this database is archiving. I fear users will not understand
>that giving a program for archival will also enable the PITR function.
>
>Greetings, Klaus
>
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Howard Bagcat | 2004-07-21 01:14:05 | Invalid User ID: 0 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-20 17:27:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-07-20 22:09:49 | V3 protocol + DECLARE problems |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2004-07-20 21:53:44 | Re: How to display privileges in psql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-20 22:56:55 | Re: FAQ_MSWIN patch |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-20 21:44:33 | Re: win32 readline |