Re: Point in Time Recovery

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-20 02:39:16
Message-ID: 40FC85D4.1080509@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>Hang on, are you supposed to MOVE or COPY away WAL segments?
>
> COPY. The checkpoint code will then delete or recycle the segment file,
> as appropriate.

So what happens if you just move it? Postgres breaks?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-20 02:54:11 Re: Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-20 02:33:15 Re: pg_config