Re: Point in Time Recovery

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-16 04:38:13
Message-ID: 40F75BB5.4000107@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Thanks for that. My comments were heartfelt, but not useful right now.

Hi Simon, I'm sorry if I gave the impression that I thought your work
wasn't worthwhile, it is :(

> I'm badly overdrawn already on my time budget, though that is my concern
> alone. There is more to do than I have time for. Pragmatically, if we
> aren't going to get there then I need to stop now, so I can progress
> other outstanding issues. All help is appreciated.

I've got your patch applied (but having some compilation problem), but
I'm really not sure what to test really. I don't really understand the
whole thing fully :/

> I'm aiming for the minimum feature set - which means we do need to take
> care over whether that set is insufficient and also to pull any part
> that doesn't stand up to close scrutiny over the next few days.
>
> Overall, my primary goal is increased robustness and availability for
> PostgreSQL...and then to have a rest!

Definitely!

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-16 04:55:10 Re: Converting epoch to timestamp
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-16 04:26:07 Re: How to display privileges in psql