Re: Point in Time Recovery

Couldn't agree more. Maybe we should have made more noise :-)

Glen Parker wrote:

>>Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 23:18, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Thanks for the vote of confidence, on or off list.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> too many people spend a lot of
>>>>money for proprietary databases, just for some missing features in
>>>>PostgreSQL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Agreed - PITR isn't aimed at existing users of PostgreSQL. If you use it
>>>already, even though it doesn't have it, then you are quite likely to be
>>>able to keep going without it.
>>>
>>>Most commercial users won't touch anything that doesn't have PITR.
>>>
>>>
>>Agreed. I am surprised at how few requests we have gotten for PITR. I
>>assume people are either using replication or not considering us.
>>
>>
>
>Don't forget that there are (must be) lots of us that know it's coming and
>are just waiting until it's available. I haven't requested per se, but
>believe me, I'm waiting for it :-)
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>