From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Date: | 2004-07-15 23:13:20 |
Message-ID: | 40F70F90.4050607@coretech.co.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>First, thanks for sticking with it to test this.
>
>I've not received such a message myself - this is interesting.
>
>Is it possible to copy that directory to one side and re-run the test?
>Add another parameter in postgresql.conf called "archive_debug = true"
>Does it happen identically the second time?
>
>
>
Yes, identical results - I re-initdb'ed and ran the process again,
rather than reuse the files.
>What time difference was there between steps 5 and 6? I think I can here
>Andreas saying "told you".... I'm thinking the backup might be somehow
>corrupted because the checkpoint occurred during the backup. Hmmm...
>
>
>
I was wondering about this, so left a bit more time in between, and
forced a sync as well for good measure.
5) $ psql -d test -c "checkpoint"; sleep 30;sync;sleep 30
6) $ tar -zcvf /data1/dump/pgdata-7.5.tar.gz *
>
>Thanks, Simon Riggs
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-07-15 23:46:54 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-15 23:01:33 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-15 23:17:07 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-15 23:12:30 | Re: Note about robustness of transaction-related data structures |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2004-07-15 23:46:54 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-15 23:01:33 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |