Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Date: 2004-07-13 17:11:06
Message-ID: 40F417AA.3070008@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 7/13/2004 12:15 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> Also, if the company was sold, the trademark would be transfer'd over to
> me, or another suitable entity ... the trademark isn't listed as an
> 'asset', and that has been made *very* clear several times ...

Which assumes that you have control over this. But this is only true for
a voluntary sale. IANAL but in the event of filing for bankruptcy (as a
hypothetical case) you might not have that option.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-07-13 17:41:57 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-13 17:06:21 Re: the PostgreSQL Elephant