Re: plperl vs. plperlu

On 7/10/2004 9:05 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> If trusted, the function is located inside a perl Safe container, a
> mechanism designed for just this purpose. Try doing something forbidden
> inside a trusted function (like opening a file) and you will see the error.

As if I would know perl :-)

But yes, I see that it does it in create_sub() now ... thanks for the
clearification.

Jan

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> Jan Wieck wrote:
>
>> while playing with the OSCON CD's, I noticed that the current version
>> of plperl installs the same function handler for both, plperl and
>> plperlu. I was wondering how it implements the important security
>> difference or, in case it is not handled and both are in fact the
>> same, who ignored this IMHO important difference in the naming
>> convention of procedural languages.
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #