Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Memory leaks using refcursors

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Memory leaks using refcursors
Date: 2007-02-19 01:09:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

I don't see a downside to it. Once we read the data from the cursor  
we have no more use for it. AFACT it should be committed.

On 18-Feb-07, at 7:20 PM, Kris Jurka wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> So I've sent Guillaume a driver which closes the refcursor  
>> directly after reading the contents for testing.
>> So far so good.
> So what's the resolution on this?  Should this fix be committed?   
> What are the downsides?
> Kris Jurka
> ---------------------------(end of  
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2007-02-19 03:03:52
Subject: Re: Binary protocol patch v7
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2007-02-19 00:20:20
Subject: Re: Memory leaks using refcursors

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group