> This question has been touched on before, but I guess it's time to face
> it fair and square: is it reasonable for an SQL implementation to add
> implementation-specific columns to an information_schema view? One
> could certainly argue that the entire point of information_schema is
> to be *standard*, not more, not less. OTOH I do not know if adding
> an extra column is likely to break anyone's application. Comments?
I don't really see the point in adding it. If that, why not everything?
Chris