From: | Kevin Barnard <kbarnard(at)speedfc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bill <bill(at)math(dot)uchicago(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Basic Postgresql Performance Question |
Date: | 2004-06-16 20:08:38 |
Message-ID: | 40D0A8C6.8050803@speedfc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Stephen Frost wrote:
>>1. It is possible to have some sort of load-balancing through buying
>>many computers without replication, i.e have one server which has the
>>databases and then other servers which has no database but just exists
>>to balance the memory and processor load? (I have heard this is possible
>>with C-JDBC)It is difficult to have enough space to replicate a 600 gb
>>database across all computers)
>>
>>
>
>I don't think so... There's something called OpenMosix which does this
>on independent processes but not for threaded programs (since it doesn't
>make sense to split them across different nodes if they're accessing the
>same memory- every memory access would have to be checked) like the
>PostgreSQL server.
>
>
>
Look at www.linuxlabs.com they have a clustering system. Not exactly
the same thing but close to what I think you are looking for.
--
Kevin Barnard
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2004-06-16 20:18:45 | Re: Basic Postgresql Performance Question |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2004-06-16 19:35:56 | Re: Basic Postgresql Performance Question |