Re: Frequently updated tables

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Frequently updated tables
Date: 2004-06-09 14:49:20
Message-ID: 40C72370.8050603@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I love PG, I've been using it since version 6x, and it has gotten
> fantastic over the years, and in many cases, I would choose it over
> Oracle, but for systems that need frequent updates, I have a lot of
> concerns.

...that's the price you pay for concurrency man...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-06-09 14:57:10 Re: thread safety tests
Previous Message Honza Pazdziora 2004-06-09 14:43:38 Re: [HACKERS] Refined LC_COLLATE or multiple database clusters?