Re: I/O support for composite types

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: I/O support for composite types
Date: 2004-06-05 21:34:58
Message-ID: 40C23C82.6040505@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>>Why not just use the syntax of the insert values with parens?
>> insert into tble values (...);
>>is very familiar so the corresponding:
>> insert into table values ( 'xxx', ('yyy', 123), 456 );
>>is also easy to understand and remember: a row is being inserted.
>
>
> I don't particularly care one way or the other about parens versus
> braces; anyone else have an opinion on that?
>

My vote would be on parens. It's more coherent. Do you use braces
anywhere else?

Kind regards,

Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-06-05 22:27:05 Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004
Previous Message elein 2004-06-05 21:34:56 Re: I/O support for composite types