Re: hash, rtree and gist ScanLists

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hash, rtree and gist ScanLists
Date: 2004-05-28 05:00:46
Message-ID: 40B6C77E.3090402@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I am updating the ScanLists so they can be dropped at subtransaction
> abort. Currently they are stored with custom "next" pointers; however
> it would be much cleaner to deal with deleting single items if they were
> Lists. Is it OK if I change them to be so?

Alvaro,

Have I mentioned that you're a total legend recently!?! Many thanks for
working on all this stuff - I'm sure the other hackers would agree!

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-28 05:25:34 Re: On query rewrite
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-05-28 04:52:14 Re: On query rewrite