pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
>
>As you can see, it takes a LOT longer. That's because the disk has to do a
>lot more work, the hardware data path has to carry twice as much data, and
>you have to manage multiple accesses to a single object, the disk.
>
>It doesn't take much imagination to see what this would mean for pg_xlog.
>
>
Well, writing off-reality benchmarks on hardware setups I'd never
suggest for db server usage proves... what?
Additionally, do you care about safety?
Regards,
Andreas