| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: win32 port getting popular |
| Date: | 2004-05-27 16:57:59 |
| Message-ID: | 40B61E17.1050108@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Merlin Moncure wrote:
>The binary win32 port has been downloaded over 3000 times since May 6,
>which averages to over 1000/week (and steadily increasing). This is
>with no mention except for win32-hackers list and Bruce's win32 status
>page. This is of course in addition to users who have compiled the
>database from source.
>
>Type in 'win32 native port' or 'win32 status page' into google, and
>Bruce's win32 status page comes up first or second (notice no mention of
>Postgres in search criteria).
>
>With NT having a as of yet pretty sizable chunk of the low/mid range
>server market, this is a pretty big deal...I'm pretty excited! My
>personal experiences with it so far are extremely positive.
>
>
>
This is all good news.
From what I can see, what we need before feature freeze is:
. fsync mods
. SCM code
. finish up pg_ctl (3 issues I am aware of):
- behaviour of getopt_long
- interaction with SCM
- form of startup command under Windows.
Is that right?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-27 17:03:06 | Re: win32 port getting popular |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-05-27 16:55:13 | Re: I want to use postresql for this app, but... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-27 17:03:06 | Re: win32 port getting popular |
| Previous Message | Bob.Henkel | 2004-05-27 16:14:48 | nested transaction patch build? |