Re: win32 port getting popular

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: win32 port getting popular
Date: 2004-05-27 16:57:59
Message-ID: 40B61E17.1050108@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers-win32

Merlin Moncure wrote:

>The binary win32 port has been downloaded over 3000 times since May 6,
>which averages to over 1000/week (and steadily increasing). This is
>with no mention except for win32-hackers list and Bruce's win32 status
>page. This is of course in addition to users who have compiled the
>database from source.
>
>Type in 'win32 native port' or 'win32 status page' into google, and
>Bruce's win32 status page comes up first or second (notice no mention of
>Postgres in search criteria).
>
>With NT having a as of yet pretty sizable chunk of the low/mid range
>server market, this is a pretty big deal...I'm pretty excited! My
>personal experiences with it so far are extremely positive.
>
>
>

This is all good news.

From what I can see, what we need before feature freeze is:

. fsync mods
. SCM code
. finish up pg_ctl (3 issues I am aware of):
- behaviour of getopt_long
- interaction with SCM
- form of startup command under Windows.

Is that right?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-05-27 17:03:06 Re: win32 port getting popular
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-05-27 16:55:13 Re: I want to use postresql for this app, but...

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-05-27 17:03:06 Re: win32 port getting popular
Previous Message Bob.Henkel 2004-05-27 16:14:48 nested transaction patch build?