Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

From: "Tels" <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com>
To: "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Petr Jelinek" <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Thomas Munro" <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Vaishnavi Prabakaran" <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Noah Misch" <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Date: 2017-12-26 09:19:42
Message-ID: 409e28341e6e32d7f59798d156db9211.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Moin,

On Mon, December 25, 2017 7:26 pm, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Petr Jelinek
> <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 21/11/17 22:06, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>
>>> After investigation, I found out that my previous patch was wrong
>>> direction. I should have changed XLogSendLogical() so that we can
>>> check the read LSN and set WalSndCaughtUp = true even after read a
>>> record without wait. Attached updated patch passed 'make check-world'.
>>> Please review it.
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This version looks good to me and seems to be in line with what we do in
>> physical replication.
>>
>> Marking as ready for committer.

(Sorry Masahiko, you'll get this twice, as fumbled the reply button.)

I have not verifed that comment and/or code are correct, just a grammar fix:

+ /*
+ * If we've sent a record is at or beyond the flushed
point, then
+ * we're caught up.

That should read more like this:

"If we've sent a record that is at or beyond the flushed point, we have
caught up."

All the best,

Tels

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2017-12-26 09:37:06 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-12-26 09:19:16 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries