| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Code comment fix |
| Date: | 2021-03-17 09:10:09 |
| Message-ID: | 409b23bc-eed2-b393-2b16-40098240cccf@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/17/21 9:11 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:31:16AM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
>> When table oids were removed by commit 578b229718e, the function
>> CatalogTupleInsert() was modified to return void but its comment was
>> left intact. Here is a trivial patch to fix that.
>
> Thanks, Vik. Good catch. I'll fix that in a bit.
Cheers.
--
Vik Fearing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-03-17 09:14:21 | Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)? |
| Previous Message | Zhihong Yu | 2021-03-17 09:06:19 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |