Re: CLUSTER locking

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER locking
Date: 2004-05-10 12:27:03
Message-ID: 409F7517.4080407@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> No. Committing the relfilenode swap would cut the knees off of any
> active scan on the old file.

Could it upgrade its lock to exclusive just before doing the swap?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-10 13:06:59 Re: CLUSTER locking
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2004-05-10 12:07:41 Re: Comments on all system objects