Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch
Date: 2004-05-02 14:20:28
Message-ID: 409503AC.7060706@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Uh, if the CLUSTER doesn't recurse, the WITHOUT shouldn't either, I
> think, and throwing an error seems fine to me, even if it isn't the same
> wording as a syntax error.

Well, maybe - up to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-02 14:24:27 Re: Fixed directory locations in installs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-05-02 13:58:22 Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch