| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Date: | 2004-04-29 19:32:03 |
| Message-ID: | 40915833.7010801@zeut.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Well, if Win32 doesn't complete by June 1, do we still do the feature
> freeze? I don't want to be adding features after the freeze, that is
> for sure. When we have done that in the past, it has caused problems
> because some stuff gets in to make the system unstable, but other stuff
> gets left out.
It seams as though the win32 port is driving the release schedule, so
instead of picking June 1 out of the air, how about getting an estimated
time for completion from them, or more specifically a date by which they
should have all the major features done?
I know it's a chicken and egg problem, do we set a date for developers
to shoot for, or do shoot for specific features and choose a date from
there. I think there can no hard and fast rule on this, it depends on
the feature and the desire to put it in place.
Matthew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-29 19:37:51 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-29 19:31:25 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |