Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date: 2004-04-23 11:59:54
Message-ID: 4089053A.9030009@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> The specific details aren't especially relevant to this thread, though.
> What is relevant is that we agree to a commitment that we will make
> it easy to build modules outside the current Postgres build environment,
> and that we will have an ongoing commitment to make sure that that keeps
> working.

Agreed.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Costa 2004-04-23 12:32:50 Re: What can we learn from MySQL?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-23 11:45:54 Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL?