MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks

From: Nick Barr <nicky(at)chuckie(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Date: 2004-04-21 08:31:39
Message-ID: 4086316B.4050304@chuckie.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

Has anyone had a look at:

http://people.ac.upc.es/zgomez/

I realize that MySQL & PG cannot really be compared (especially when you
consider the issues that MySQL has with things like data integrity) but
still surely PG would perform better than the stats show (i.e. #7 31.28
seconds versus 42 minutes!!!).

On a side note it certainly looks like linux kernel 2.6 is quite a bit
faster in comparision to 2.4.

Nick

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edoardo Ceccarelli 2004-04-21 08:34:48 Re: slow seqscan
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-04-21 07:52:55 Re: slow seqscan