From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Serov <serovov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Subject: | Re: Diffrent column ordering after dump/restore tables with INHERITS |
Date: | 2010-02-27 16:02:08 |
Message-ID: | 407d949e1002270802m208c0b3cw80ab8b57da7583a6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
yes, that's on the todo list.you can search back in the archives for
discussions on how to do this without making the code difficult to debug.
this is a bug but it's a longstanding known bug inan area where we have
lots of known limitations and nobody is too excited about spending lots of
effort to fix up.
greg
On 27 Feb 2010 14:16, "Oleg Serov" <serovov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
I'm think you should add some abstract-layer for handling column ordering
not as they stored at disk. It is possible?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> Tom Lane ...
--
С уважением
Олег Серов
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2010-02-27 16:28:21 | BUG #5348: Postgres crashes with index on xpath_string |
Previous Message | Oleg Serov | 2010-02-27 14:16:06 | Re: Diffrent column ordering after dump/restore tables with INHERITS |