| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Clemmons <glassresistor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |
| Date: | 2010-02-08 18:34:01 |
| Message-ID: | 407d949e1002081034n3dd82addw2b93d35db042042c@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> Yeah, it seems there are two patches here -- one is the addition of
>> fsync_fname() and the other is the fsync_prepare stuff.
Sorry, I'm just catching up on my mail from FOSDEM this past weekend.
I had come to the same conclusion as Greg that I might as well just
commit it with Tom's "pg_flush_data()" name and we can decide later if
and when we have pg_fsync_start()/pg_fsync_finish() whether it's worth
keeping two apis or not.
So I was just going to commit it like that but I discovered last week
that I don't have cvs write access set up yet. I'll commit it as soon
as I generate a new ssh key and Dave installs it, etc. I intentionally
picked a small simple patch that nobody was waiting on because I knew
there was a risk of delays like this and the paperwork. I'm nearly
there.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2010-02-08 18:38:56 | Re: damage control mode |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2010-02-08 18:19:49 | Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-02-08 18:59:09 | Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-02-08 17:49:20 | Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline |