Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New mug design

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New mug design
Date: 2009-12-02 01:55:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> It could be:

I don't feel these make it better. The point of the pun is to have
something which looks natural and not out of place but which also
reads as an english sentence telling people they should use Postgres.
START TRANSACTION is imho a compatibility syntax we have to ease
migration from other systems and neither reads naturally as an
postgresish sql command, nor does it have a double-meaning unless it's
saying that people should buy a license or support contract.

An argument could be made for BEGIN WORK -- but even that seems out of
place to me.


In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tommy GildsethDate: 2009-12-02 07:21:27
Subject: Re: New mug design
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-12-02 01:40:49
Subject: Re: New mug design

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group