Re: clang's static checker report.

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: clang's static checker report.
Date: 2009-08-23 17:16:38
Message-ID: 407d949e0908231016v4ea77b97g6e2acfa7f0479423@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz<gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> wrote:
> http://zlew.org/postgresql_static_check/scan-build-2009-08-23-5/report-MAVb5D.html#EndPath
> for a very positive one - at least from strict language point of view.
>
> consider: float f = 100000000; f++; printf("%f\n", f);

I believe the maximum value of the numbers involved here is the sample
size which is currently capped at 10,000. But I'm not exactly sure.

--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-08-23 17:20:13 Re: clang's static checker report.
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-08-23 17:11:10 Re: clang's static checker report.