Re: WIP: generalized index constraints

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Date: 2009-08-21 03:08:33
Message-ID: 407d949e0908202008k15a06f9ev3e1d8efd0ce1a582@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Brendan Jurd<direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> They'd expect it to create an index sans the unique
> constraint.  Ignoring the user's intention and copying the index as-is
> (including the unique constraint) would be unfriendly.
>
> Unless the SQL spec demands that we do so?

There are no indexes in the SQL spec.

--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-08-21 04:04:26 Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-08-21 03:00:04 hot standby - further cleanup of recovery procs stuff