Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Dan Bikle <dan(dot)bikle(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list
Date: 2009-07-23 23:27:34
Message-ID: 407d949e0907231627y21f5067dt610a3060fca5d2ea@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/21/09 4:08 PM, Dan Bikle wrote:
>>
>> My opinion is that sfpug is good enough for the entire bay area.  We
>> dont need sjcpug or svpug.
>
> Ok, we'll just use the SFPUG list for now.

Aw, I was thinking of all the valspeak jokes we could make if you went
with valleypug :)

--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-07-23 23:28:14 Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-07-23 23:04:53 Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list