Re: PostgreSQL configuration

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL configuration
Date: 2004-04-13 08:09:52
Message-ID: 407BA050.4070603@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:

>ii) I think the -C switch *WITH* the -D switch has viable usability.
>Consider this, you are testing two different database layouts and/or RAID
>controllers. You could easily bounce back and forth from *identical*
>configurations like this:
>
>
>
Convenient indeed, but I would like to see the association of .conf file
-> data dir remain reasonably solid. Its all about the foot gun.

>iii) I don't like the PID file at all. Not one bit, but I had a few people
>ask for it in the patch, it works as advertized and expected. It isn't my
>place to say how someone should use something. One of my customers wanted
>it, so I provided them with it. That is the beauty of open source.
>
>
>
>
>
I think that there is a difference between a special patch suitable for
a particular customer and general release, and that maybe this addition
falls right in there.

best wishes

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-04-13 08:15:18 Re: PostgreSQL configuration
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-04-13 07:33:12 Re: PostgreSQL configuration