Re: make == as = ?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make == as = ?
Date: 2004-04-07 13:53:51
Message-ID: 407407EF.3010403@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fabien COELHO wrote:

>>>From my point of view, my students come from a java first course, so they
>>>have to learn again some new syntax and new operators. Small stuff, but
>>>it can help to say "same as java" and go on to new concepts.
>>>
>>>
>>Don't you want them to learn SQL?
>>
>>
>
>I want to teach them the concepts: relations, views, relationnal algebra,
>aggregation and so on, and how to build a resonnable schema from a
>real-world problem.
>
>I do not consider whether the comparison is == or = as a key issue.
>
>Moreover, there are many SQL flavors around, so whatever the detailed
>syntax I learn them, it won't be the one they will have to face if the
>database they use is different. So why bother?
>
>That's just my view.
>
>
>

My sister is a teacher - she has a bumper sticker that reads
"Monolinguism is curable".

There is a special display in my imaginary hall of fame of bad design
decisions for the use of = and == in C and its blind adoption by C++,
Java, Perl, etc, along with the associated use of "expr ;" as a statement.

That's my view ;-)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-04-07 14:19:46 Re: make == as = ?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-04-07 13:39:15 Re: Socket communication for contrib