Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Date: 2019-02-26 12:04:56
Message-ID: 406e8ae7449fa78272aebeb69ad6c9a4a8f8463e.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> Not sure exactly what value would accomplish that goal.

I think autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = 2000 is a good starting point.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-02-26 12:15:41 Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2019-02-26 11:55:15 Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode