Re: Better support for whole-row operations and composite

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Better support for whole-row operations and composite
Date: 2004-04-03 06:33:49
Message-ID: 406E5ACD.2020509@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>... The SRF API was for user defined functions, not
>>procedural languages anyway. I'll look at how the other procedural
>>languages handle tuple arguments.
>
> It was a dozen-or-so-lines change in each of the PL languages AFAIR.
> You will probably also want to look at what you do to return tuple
> results.

OK, thanks.

Just for reference, what is arg[i] if it isn't a (TupleTableSlot *)
anymore -- is it just a HeapTuple?

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-03 06:42:44 Re: Better support for whole-row operations and composite types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-03 06:25:40 Re: Better support for whole-row operations and composite types