From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Remove some dead code in selfuncs.c |
Date: | 2023-01-19 16:43:47 |
Message-ID: | 4069769.1674146627@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
I wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>> Remove some dead code in selfuncs.c
>> RelOptInfo.userid is the same for all relations in a given inheritance
>> tree, so the code in examine_variable() and example_simple_variable()
>> that repeats the ACL checks on the root parent rel instead of a given
>> leaf child relations need not recompute userid too.
> This change seems rather ill-advised.
Ah, sorry, -ENOCAFFEINE. It's talking about the access-as-user field,
not the relation's owner. I agree that as querytrees are currently
built, this is probably a safe optimization. But do we really want
to hard-wire such a subtle assumption to gain a microscopic speed
benefit? It's not as though GetUserId() is expensive.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-01-19 16:55:17 | pgsql: Keep perl style checker happy |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-19 15:45:34 | Re: pgsql: Remove some dead code in selfuncs.c |