| From: | "Magnus Naeslund(t)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu, Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
| Date: | 2004-03-25 17:22:45 |
| Message-ID: | 40631565.4040409@fbab.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> You can use distributed revision control systems as centralized
> systems, but not vice-versa.
>
Not true, the other way around exists, that is what svk does.
> As far as understanding the simplicity of arch (if you wanted to
> understand the problems it solves and implement it yourself), a really
> good presentation was posted today to the arch list that sums it up
> quickly and concisely. It's hard to go through that and not think, ``I
> could write this.''
>
> http://web.verbum.org/tla/grokking-arch/grokking-arch.html
>
Will read it, thanks.
Regards,
Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-25 17:23:36 | Re: Memory usage during vacuum |
| Previous Message | Shelby Cain | 2004-03-25 17:12:10 | Re: Memory usage during vacuum |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-25 18:52:56 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |
| Previous Message | markw | 2004-03-25 17:16:40 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |