Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions
Date: 2017-12-19 02:48:14
Message-ID: 405adbc8-9cfd-e24f-bf37-32eaaa963e84@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/12/18 23:25, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> (I wonder why
> this function needs a local variable "partition_check" -- seems
> pointless).

Before 15ce775faa4 [1], there were more than one line where
partition_check was being set, but maybe it still didn't have to be a
separate variable.

Thanks,
Amit

[1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=15ce775faa4

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message leoaaryan 2017-12-19 03:10:47 Statically linking ICU with Postgres
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-19 00:40:17 Re: Tracking of page changes for backup purposes. PTRACK [POC]