Re: bug in 7.4 SET WITHOUT OIDs

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: bug in 7.4 SET WITHOUT OIDs
Date: 2004-03-23 07:34:39
Message-ID: 405FE88F.1010007@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>Maybe it needs CASCADE/RESTRICT added?
>
> Seems like overkill, considering that this is a very marginal feature.
> I'm happy to decree that it works in whichever way is the easiest to
> implement.

In that case, it seems to me that it has to be default RESTRICT. If
anything depend on it, it must fail. Otherwise when you do it, it could
drop views, functions, everything.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2004-03-23 08:52:45 LIKE ANY and the like?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-23 07:03:09 Re: bug in 7.4 SET WITHOUT OIDs