Re: COPY formatting

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY formatting
Date: 2004-03-19 21:43:56
Message-ID: 405B699C.4050901@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:

>
>Overall, I assert again that approaching this issue through COPY enhancements
>is really not the way to go. We should be looking at a client utility,
>like pg_import and pg_export. The primary purpose of COPY is bulk loads
>for backup/restore, and I'm against doing a lot of tinkering which might make
>it less efficient or introduce new issues into what's currently very
>reliable.
>
>
>

That's not unreasonable. I floated my idea as an alternative to a much
more radical proposal. If we decided against it we should remove the
TODO item.

As against that, if we don't do this then I think we should embrace
these utility programs more, possibly bringing them into the distribution.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2004-03-20 03:48:17 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-19 21:14:15 Re: COPY formatting