| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
| Date: | 2004-03-14 21:07:04 |
| Message-ID: | 4054C978.5010607@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I am not opposed to including a small logrotator for stderr logging.
>> I just think it is redundant when a good highly configurable logging
>> facility already exists. But, if Red Hat wants to pay Tom to do
>> it... :-)
>
>
> Maybe it is a question of preference or what is more convenient
> depends on the specific circunstances of the installation. I would
> prefer to give the option to the users, if possible.
>
This strikes me as the crux of the matter. Using syslog in certain
configurations may well be the best solution, but *we* should not be
enforcing that choice, IMNSHO.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-14 21:16:05 | Re: listening addresses |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-14 21:00:26 | Re: Log rotation |