| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage |
| Date: | 2004-03-03 23:44:40 |
| Message-ID: | 40466DE8.1030309@samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-pitr pgsql-performance |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hmmm. I was told that it was this way for 7.4 as well; that's why it's in
> the docs that way.
No such statement is made in the docs AFAIK: they merely say "If
nonzero, turn on WAL-related debugging output."
I invented a new #ifdef symbol when making this change in CVS HEAD, so
I think you are misremembering.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-03 23:46:23 | Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage |
| Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2004-03-03 23:23:51 | Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-03 23:46:23 | Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-03-03 21:40:09 | Re: [PERFORM] WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-03 23:46:23 | Re: [HACKERS] [PERFORM] WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage |
| Previous Message | CoL | 2004-03-03 23:37:46 | Re: Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes |