Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1

From: Greg Spiegelberg <gspiegelberg(at)cranel(dot)com>
To: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1
Date: 2004-03-03 21:37:48
Message-ID: 4046502C.7090307@cranel.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Would turning autocommit off help?

Vivek Khera wrote:
>>>>>>"FW" == Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de> writes:
>
>
> FW> After increasing the number of checkpoint segments and the shared-memory
> FW> buffers, performance is back to the expected levels. It might even be a
> FW> bit faster.
>
> If you've got the time, could you try also doing the full bulk insert
> test with the checkpoint log files on another physical disk? See if
> that's any faster.
>

--
Greg Spiegelberg
Sr. Product Development Engineer
Cranel, Incorporated.
Phone: 614.318.4314
Fax: 614.431.8388
Email: gspiegelberg(at)Cranel(dot)com
Cranel. Technology. Integrity. Focus.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2004-03-03 21:39:37 Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2004-03-03 20:28:53 Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1